Companies that were sued over contaminated pet food linked to the deaths of perhaps thousands of dogs and cats have agreed to pay $24 million to pet owners in the United States and Canada.

The settlement is detailed in papers filed late Thursday in U.S. District Court in New Jersey. It still needs a judge’s approval.

“The settlement attempts to reimburse pet owners for all of their economic damages,” said Russell Paul, a lawyer for plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

The deal would affect people who incurred expenses directly related to the illness or death of a pet linked to the food, which was at the center of the biggest-ever U.S. pet food recall in 2007.

Nearly 300 people sued about 30 companies in state and federal courts. They and perhaps thousands of other pet owners would be eligible for payments under the deal.

Ontario-based Menu Foods Income Fund, which makes dog and cat food under about 90 brand names, and other firms that make or sell pet food announced April 1 that they were settling lawsuits with pet owners.

The pet food was discovered to contain wheat gluten imported from China that was contaminated with melamine, a chemical used to make plastics. Though Menu was the first company to issue recalls, four other companies eventually recalled pet foods, too.

Some of the companies have already paid out more than $8 million to people whose pets were sickened or killed after eating the contaminated food.

Under the terms of the deal announced Thursday, pet owners could be reimbursed for all reasonable expenditures, including veterinarian bills and burial or cremation costs.

Pet owners could also ask for the fair market value of their deceased pets, if that is higher than the costs incurred. Owners who do not have documentation of their expenses can get up to $900 each. All claims are subject to a review.

The companies say they will donate any money left in the fund after claims are paid out to animal welfare charities.

?

It happens to all of us. You fall in love with someone’s looks… but then he’s not quite, what you expected. Even, sometimes, if he’s a cat.

“People come in and say, I had a black and white tuxedo cat before, so that’s what I want,” says Jim Monsma of the Washington Animal Rescue League in Washington, D.C. “But cats are not all the same. They have widely divergent personalities.”

That’s why the shelter is now using the Feline-ality program, developed by behaviorist Dr. Emily Weiss of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

Part of the ASPCA’s Meet Your Match program, which also includes Canine-ality for dogs, the program assesses a variety of behaviors in individual cats. It rates the animals on confidence and sociability, which Weiss’ research has shown are independent of each other.

The program then tallies those assessments to place the cat into nine personality categories, which can be matched with a family’s situation and desires.

It’s not unlike a magazine quiz to find out, “Which kind of cat are you?”

The program is used at 45 shelters, with additional facilities preparing to use it.

On this day in the Washington shelter, Monsma brings Barnaby the cat into an unfamiliar room and opens the carrier.

Barnaby shoots out and takes charge, checking out the room and everything in it. Monsma uses a stopwatch to track how much time Barnaby spends on social interactions. For example, he adds up how many seconds Barnaby spends trying to get on his lap. He also monitors his noises and blink rate, both indicators of sociability.

Monsma then initiates some interaction, offering a hand, three different toys, and hug. Each transaction earns Barnaby some points.

His total comes out high on both scales – he’s both highly sociable and highly confident.

All of the types have fun, vivid names and descriptions. Barnaby is “leader of the band.” His opposite, a cat low on both scales, is called a “private investigator,” who stays out of trouble.

A more middle of the road cat is familiar to many people: the “personal assistant.” “You’re working on the computer? Let me press the keys. Reading the paper? I’ll hold the pages down for you… You’ll wonder how you ever managed without me,” according to program literature.

Equally important to the Feline-ality program is the fact that people differ, too. Adopters fill out a questionnaire and the results give them a color code, telling them which set of personality types would be best for them to consider.

The program aims to end animal-human mismatches, often a reason cats are returned to the shelter, Monsma says.

Weiss says the program has helped to increase adoptions in shelters that have tested the Feline-ality program, partly because people find the process fun.

Experts may differ on what details of a test best can predict a pet’s behavior in an adoptive home, says animal behaviorist, author and radio host Patricia McConnell.

However, she applauds these efforts to enlighten people about the differences among cats, which have always been less well understood than dogs.

“They’re complicated, interesting animals with rich emotional lives that deserve to be treated well,” she says. “Any kind of test is somewhat limited, but it’s an excellent idea to be thinking as much as we can about what’s the right cat for the right home, and whether we can do some matchmaking.”

Weiss says that people still sometimes fall in love with a cat that is not a perfect fit, but the program can help in these cases too: People who know what issues to expect are more prepared to deal with them.

Nevertheless, as Monsma says, “There are so many cats out there, why not get one that fits?